orchidproject.org


Tags Whois Backlink & Rankings Speed Safety Headers Similar Sites Keywords H Tags
Tags Whois Rank Speed Safety Headers Similar Sites Keywords H Tags

orchidproject.org Website Info

orchidproject.org (Orchid Project Home - Orchid Project) was registered first at 2010-04-30 11:50:24. DNS looks Active and website looks Accessable. orchidproject.org Website SEMRush Rank is 2,363,079. orchidproject.org seems popular on facebook. According to Google, website speed score is 18/100 and SLOW. Website looks safe for children.
orchidproject.org


orchidproject.org Website Tags

Domain Status:
✓ Active
Is Site Accessable?:
✓ Yes
SSL(https):
✓ Yes
Accessable Url:
https://www.orchidproject.org
Title:
Orchid Project Home - Orchid Project
Description:
Orchid Project Home - Orchid Project
Categories :
Marketing/Merchandising, Political Organizations
Mobile Friendly?:
✓ Yes
Canonical URL:
[Not Set]

orchidproject.org Domain & Whois Details

Refresh
Domain Create Date:
2010-04-30 11:50:24
Domain Age:
15 years, 2 months, 2 days
Domain Owner:
Sponsoring FastDomain Inc. (R1455-LROR)Registrant David AdamAdmin David AdamTech Bluehost Inc
Server Software:
PHP/7.4.33
Server Type:
cloudflare-nginx
Nameservers:
KATE.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM - GABE.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM
Hosting Location:
Country: Singapore (SG) /
Location:
ISP:
IP:
104.24.97.253 , 104.24.96.253

orchidproject.org Backlinks & Rankings

SEMRush Rank:
2,363,079
Semrush Rank is a proprietary score that lets you find the domains that are getting the most traffic from organic search.
SEMRush Traffic:
220
Number of users expected to visit the website during the following month.
SEMRush Costs:
86
Estimated price of organic keywords in Google AdWords.
SEMRush URL Links:
1,864
Number of links to URL according to SemRush.
SEMRush Website Links:
6,429
Number of links to the website according to SemRush.
SEMRush Domain Links:
8,675
Number of links to SemRush Domain.
SEMRush Keywords In Top 100:
812
Number of keywords where site in Google's organic search top 100.

orchidproject.org Social Media

Facebook Comments:
237
Facebook Shares:
2,350
Facebook Reactions:
992

orchidproject.org Website Speed (Desktop)

Refresh
Overall Category:
SLOW
The human readable speed "category"
Speed Index:
18
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. [Learn more about the Speed Index metric].
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS):
0.09 (FAST)
The Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) metric measures how much unexpected layout shifts affect the user experience on a page. These layout shifts occur when content moves around without prior user input. CLS
Time to First Byte (TTFB):
3.784 s (SLOW)
TTFB (time to first byte) is the number of milliseconds it takes for a client’s browser to receive the first byte of the response from the web server. Usually, TTFB can be improved with faster hosting and server optimizations. TTFB
First Input Delay (FID):
4 ms (FAST)
First Input Delay (FID) measures the time from when the user interacts with your site for the first time (click a link, tap on a button, etc.) to the time when the browser is able to respond to that interaction. Google recommends keeping FID below 100ms for a good user experience. FID
First Contentful Paint (FCP):
4.673 s (SLOW)
FCP (First Contentful Paint) measures the time from a user’s navigation to when the browser renders the first bit of content from the DOM. In other words, FCP marks the time at which the first text or image is painted for the user. According to PageSpeed Insights, FCP should occur in under 2 seconds. FCP
Interaction to Next Paint (INP):
49 ms (FAST)
Interaction to Next Paint (INP) is a web performance metric that measures user interface responsiveness – how quickly a website responds to user interactions like clicks or key presses. Specifically, it measures how much time elapses between a user interaction like a click or key press and the next time the user sees a visual update on the page. INP
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP):
5.275 s (SLOW)
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) is a metric that measures when the largest content in the viewport is rendered. It is used to measure how long it takes for the main content of your webpage to appear on the screen. Everything below 2.5s is considered good LCP time by PageSpeed Insights. LCP
Total Size:
2639 KB
Total Size. Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times.
Server Response Time:
2484 ms
Initial server response time. Keep the server response time for the main document short because all other requests depend on it. [Learn more about the Time to First Byte metric](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/performance/time-to-first-byte/).
Final Url:
https://www.orchidproject.org/
Canonicalized and final URL for the document, after following page redirects (if any).
Last Date Checked:
6/3/2023 11:58:53 AM
The last time we checked this website.
Site Speed Check(Full)

orchidproject.org HTML Resources

Type
Request Count
Size
Total
103
2,639 KB
Image
19
1,231 KB
Third-party
28
1,200 KB
Script
44
904 KB
Stylesheet
25
339 KB
Font
3
116 KB
Document
3
41 KB
Other
9
5 KB
Media
0
0 KB

orchidproject.org Website Safety

Refresh
Last Check Date:
5/23/2023 6:40:30 AM
Fortiguard:
Political Organizations
Mcafee Category:
Marketing/Merchandising
OpenDNS:
BeFirst
Cloudflare DNS:
OK
MyWot Child Safety:
99

orchidproject.org HTTP Headers

Refresh
Accept-Ranges :
none
Content-Type :
text/html; charset=UTF-8
Date :
Wed, 07 Jun 2023 06:44:39 GMT
Link :
<https://www.orchidproject.org/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/", <https://www.orchidproject.org/w
Server :
Apache
Transfer-Encoding :
chunked
Vary :
Accept-Encoding,User-Agent
X-Powered-By :
PHP/7.4.33


orchidproject.org W3C HTML Validation Check Now

Last Check Date:
5/30/2023 12:00:00 AM
Errors:
37
Warnings:
0
Info:
58
Check Live:
Check orchidproject.org HTML Errors

orchidproject.org Similar Sites

Website
Title
Rank
28toomany.org 28toomany.org
The FGM/C Research Initiative | FGM/C Research Initiative
33,381,211
dofeve.org dofeve.org
Eve Mag - A better mind.
494,470
tostan.org tostan.org
Home - Tostan International
2,730,225
stopfgmmideast.org stopfgmmideast.org
4,368,648
sahiyo.com sahiyo.com
SAHIYO – United Against Female Genital Cutting
1,275,435
Top orchidproject.org Alternatives

orchidproject.org Site Keywords

Abandonment
country
education
female circumcision
female genital cutting
Female Genital Mutilation
FGC
FGM
FGMC
human rights
INFORMATION
map
News
orchid project
Orchid Project Home
resources

orchidproject.org Site H Tags

Check Now
h2
Get updates from us
h3
Donate Now
h3
Monthly Donation
h3
Single Donation
h3
Where does FGC happen?
h3
News and Stories
h3
UK FGM/C charity, Orchid Project, is launching a regional office and 5-year Global Strategic Plan in
h3
Board Chair Rotation Announcement
h3
December Newsletter
h3
Our Supporters
h4
Increase your donation


What is SitesDB?

SitesDB is one of the largest databases of websites and domain names on the internet, with over 40 million entries and growing. For more than 12 years, we've been manually verifying and updating website and domain details, combining human expertise with AI-powered systems to ensure the accuracy and relevance of our data.

At SitesDB, we provide in-depth technical and useful information about websites and domains, including:

  • Website meta tags
  • Domain & WHOIS data
  • General backlink and ranking statistics
  • Social media engagement stats
  • Root page speed insights
  • Website content and HTML resources
  • Website safety and security details, sourced from multiple trusted security providers
  • HTTP headers analysis
  • HTML validation reports
  • Lists of similar websites and competitors
  • Website keyword analysis, including top traffic-driving keywords
  • Heading structure (H tags) breakdown
  • Domain variations across different TLDs (Top-Level Domains)

In addition to this data, SitesDB offers a suite of website analysis tools — including Chrome CRUX, Google Lighthouse, and our own AI-enhanced algorithms — to help identify alternative websites, direct competitors, and similar sites, all continuously refined through both automated systems and human review.